File #: 17-163    Version: 1
Type: Rules Proposal Status: Passed
File created: 8/11/2017 In control: Judicial Council
On agenda: 9/15/2017 Final action: 9/15/2017
Title: Family Law: Transfers of Title IV-D Child Support Cases Between State and Tribal Court (Action Required)
Attachments: 1. 20170915-17-163
Title
Title
Family Law: Transfers of Title IV-D Child Support Cases Between State and Tribal Court (Action Required)

body
Summary
Summary
The Family and Juvenile Law Advisory Committee (committee) and the Tribal Court-State Court Forum (forum) propose amendments to rule 5.372 governing discretionary transfer of title IV-D child support cases between state courts and tribal courts in cases of concurrent jurisdiction. The amendments would allow transfers from the tribal court to the state court, clarify the contents and procedures for motions to transfer, and modify the factors and procedures for ruling on motions to transfer. These proposed amendments are based on suggestions received from those involved in transfers between the state courts in Humboldt and Del Norte Counties and the Yurok Tribal Court.

body
Recommendation
Recommendation
The Family and Juvenile Law Advisory Committee and the Tribal Court-State Court Forum recommend that effective January 1, 2018, the Judicial Council amend rule 5.372 to:
1. Provide by the language in the title and subdivision (a) that a title IV-D child support case may be transferred between tribal and state courts in both directions. When adopted, the current rule had only envisioned a title IV-D child support case being transferred from the state court to the tribal court. However, the goal is to ensure that a title IV-D child support case will be in the jurisdiction (tribal or state) that is best able to serve the family and protect the best interests of the child.
2. Add new subdivision (i), which describes the state court procedure when a tribal court with concurrent jurisdiction decides it is in the child's best interest for the case to be heard in state court and stipulates that such transfers are exempt from the payment of any filing fees that might otherwise apply.
3. Revise subdivision (h) to add the exception in new subdivision (i), which authorizes the filing of a motion to transfer a case back to state court...

Click here for full text