File #: 21-040    Version: 1
Type: Budget Proposal Status: Passed
File created: 11/17/2020 In control: Judicial Council
On agenda: 7/9/2021 Final action: 7/9/2021
Title: Judicial Branch Budget | 2022-23 Budget Change Proposals for the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, Superior Courts, Judicial Branch Facilities Program, Habeas Corpus Resource Center, and Judicial Council (Action Required)
Attachments: 1. 20210709-21-040, 2. 21-040 2022-23 BCPs PPT for Judicial Council
Title
Title
Judicial Branch Budget | 2022-23 Budget Change Proposals for the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, Superior Courts, Judicial Branch Facilities Program, Habeas Corpus Resource Center, and Judicial Council (Action Required)
body
Summary
Summary
To continue responsible reinvestment in the judicial branch allowing for greater access to justice for California's citizens, the Judicial Branch Budget Committee unanimously recommends submitting these 2022-23 budget change proposals to the State Department of Finance.
body
Recommendation
Recommendation
The Judicial Branch Budget Committee recommends that the Judicial Council, effective July 9, 2021, approve the following 2022-23 budget change proposals (not in priority order) for submission to the California Department of Finance on September 3, 2021:

1. Proposition 66 Costs in the Courts of Appeal and Habeas Corpus Resource Center-$15.5 million;
2. Appellate Court Security-$1.5 million;
3. Courts of Appeal Court-Appointed Counsel Program-$6.4 million;
4. Self-Help Centers in Trial Courts: Expanding In-Person and Online Resources-$23.3 million;
5. Criminal Justice Improvements to Increase Services and Efficiencies Related to Substance Use Disorders, Mental Illness, and Sex Offender Registration Termination-$35.9 million;
6. Trial Court Capital-Outlay Funding: 2022-23 through 2025-26-$151.7 million;
7. Trial Court and Court of Appeal Deferred Maintenance and Emergency Leak Mitigation-$102.4 million;
8. Facility Modification Prioritization and Costs-$68 million;
9. Branchwide Information Technology Modernization-$40.6 million;
10. Language Access Efforts in California Courts-$17 million;
11. Additional Legal Services Staff for Public Access Work-$767,000;
12. Trial Court Workload Formula Gap Funding to 85 percent-$148.1 million; and
13. Judicial Branch Data and Information Governance-$11.5 million.

A complete description of these BCPs is provided in the Analysis/Rationale section.
body
Speakers
Speake...

Click here for full text